OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Possible Plastics, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Grove City, Ohio · All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing · NAICS 326199

1inspections
3citation items
$2,040current penalties
May 12, 2016last inspection

OSHA has inspected Possible Plastics, Inc. once in Ohio.

The inspection began on May 12, 2016 after a complaint, in Grove City.

That inspection ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $4,080 and now stand at $2,040, 50% lower after settlements or reviews.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,500, and Possible Plastics, Inc. averages $2,040 (1 cited inspection).

Possible Plastics, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Ohio · latest 90 days of OSHA records

275employers cited

6 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Ohio: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Ohio

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Possible Plastics, Inc. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341468106 OPENED MAY 12, 2016Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 7 employees at the site · Closed Aug 17, 2016

1620 Feddern Ave. Building B, Grove City, OH 43123 · All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1 Serious$1,360$680Jul 14, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks
 Serious$1,360$680Jul 14, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding
 Serious$1,360$680Jul 14, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.178 · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii)

(ii) Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer shall ensure that each operator has successfully completed the training required by this paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5).

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii)

(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.

29 CFR 1910.95 · Noise

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1)

(c) Hearing conservation program. (1) The employer shall administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent. For purposes of the hearing conservation program, employee noise exposures shall be computed in accordance with appendix A and Table G-16a, and without regard to any attenuation provided by the use of personal protective equipment.

Other all other plastics product manufacturing employers in Ohio

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Ohio the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.