OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Precision X-Ray, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

North Branford, Connecticut · Irradiation Apparatus Manufacturing · NAICS 334517

2inspections
3citation items
$4,056current penalties
Aug 31, 2022last inspection

OSHA has inspected Precision X-Ray, Inc. 2 times in Connecticut since 2017.

The latest one began on Aug 31, 2022 after a complaint, in Madison.

Those inspections ended with 3 citation items: 2 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $5,794 and now stand at $4,056, 30% lower after settlements or reviews.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Precision X-Ray, Inc. averages $4,056 (1 cited inspection).

Precision X-Ray, Inc. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Precision X-Ray, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2017 to 2022
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Connecticut · latest 90 days of OSHA records

85employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Connecticut: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Connecticut

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Precision X-Ray, Inc. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 346209273 OPENED AUG 31, 2022Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 25 employees at the site · Closed Feb 28, 2023

14 New Road, Madison, CT 06443 · Irradiation Apparatus Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 342755758 OPENED NOV 7, 2017Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 15 employees at the site · Closed Jan 25, 2018

15 Commerce Drive, North Branford, CT 06471 · Irradiation Apparatus Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks
Serious$2,897$2,028Nov 28, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9) · Grinders and abrasive wheels
Serious$2,897$2,028Nov 28, 2017Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
Other-than-serious$0$0Nov 28, 2017Final

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2025, the Madison site logged 1 recordable injury or illness among about 46 workers: 2.3 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 0.3 for its industry. Those cases cost 2 days away from work.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
Precision X-Ray, Inc.
Madison · 2025
46 112.30.3

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)

(d) Hazard assessment and equipment selection. (1) The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall:

29 CFR 1910.178 · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i)

(l) Operator training. (1) Safe operation. (i) The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).

29 CFR 1910.215 · Grinders and abrasive wheels

29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9)

(9) Exposure adjustment. Safety guards of the types described in subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, shall be constructed so that the peripheral protecting member can be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs (b) (3) and (4) of this section shall never be exceeded, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top shall never exceed one-fourth inch. (See Figures O-18, O-19, O-20, O-21, O-22, and O-23.)

Other irradiation apparatus manufacturing employers in Connecticut

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Connecticut the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.