OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Rda Construction LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Baltimore, Maryland · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
6citation items
$2,625current penalties
Mar 31, 2023last inspection

Rda Construction LLC has one OSHA inspection on record in Maryland.

OSHA opened it on Mar 31, 2023 as a planned inspection, in Baltimore, and the case has not closed yet.

From that inspection OSHA issued 6 citation items: 5 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $2,625 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.

Most often, OSHA cited 1926.503, fall protection training in construction (2 items).

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Rda Construction LLC averages $2,625 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Rda Construction LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2023 to 2023
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Maryland · latest 90 days of OSHA records

197employers cited

39 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Maryland: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Maryland

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Rda Construction LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 346602378 OPENED MAR 31, 2023Open

Planned · Complete · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Open

1200 Walters Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21239 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1) · Construction safety programs
 Serious$875$875May 11, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2) · Construction safety programs
 Serious$0$0May 11, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$875$875May 11, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
 Serious$0$0May 11, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$875$875May 11, 2023Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
 Other-than-serious$0$0May 11, 2023Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.20 · Construction safety programs

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1)

(b) Accident prevention responsibilities. (1) It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2)

(2) Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other roofing contractors employers in Maryland

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Maryland the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.