OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

RM Construction, LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Exeter, New Hampshire · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
3citation items
$9,376current penalties
Jun 14, 2023last inspection

OSHA has inspected RM Construction, LLC once in New Hampshire.

The inspection began on Jun 14, 2023 as a planned inspection, in Exeter.

That inspection ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $9,376 and still stand at $9,376.

Fall protection systems comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.502.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and RM Construction, LLC averages $9,376 (1 cited inspection).

RM Construction, LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2023 to 2023
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites RM Construction, LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 346777378 OPENED JUN 14, 2023Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Closed Oct 20, 2026

35 High Street, Exeter, NH 03833 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$4,688$4,688Oct 20, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$4,688$4,688Oct 20, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$0$0Oct 20, 2023Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15)

(15) Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment shall be independent of any anchorage being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, or shall be designed, installed, and used as follows:

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17)

(17) The attachment point of the body belt shall be located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness shall be located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.

Other roofing contractors employers in New Hampshire

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.