OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Roofer Dude, LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Maugansville, Maryland · Residential Remodelers · NAICS 236118

1inspections
5citation items
$2,061current penalties
Jul 18, 2019last inspection

OSHA has inspected Roofer Dude, LLC once in Maryland.

The inspection began on Jul 18, 2019 as a planned inspection, in Maugansville; the case is still open.

That inspection ended with 5 citation items: 5 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $2,061 and still stand at $2,061.

Electrical safety in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.416.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Roofer Dude, LLC averages $2,061 (1 cited inspection).

Roofer Dude, LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2019 to 2019
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Maryland · latest 90 days of OSHA records

204employers cited

3 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Maryland: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Maryland

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Roofer Dude, LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344164835 OPENED JUL 18, 2019Open

Planned · Complete · Safety · 1 employee at the site · Open

13903 Maugansville Ave., Maugansville, MD 21767 · Residential Remodelers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2) · Construction safety programs
 Serious$437$437Oct 1, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1) · Electrical safety in construction
 Serious$750$750Oct 1, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3) · Electrical safety in construction
 Serious$0$0Oct 1, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$437$437Oct 1, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$437$437Oct 1, 2019Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.20 · Construction safety programs

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2)

(2) Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.

29 CFR 1926.416 · Electrical safety in construction

29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1)

(a) Protection of employees. (1) No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

Other residential remodelers employers in Maryland

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Maryland the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.