OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Royal Canin: OSHA inspections and violations

North Sioux City, South Dakota · Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing · NAICS 311111

2inspections
2citation items
$11,000current penalties
Jan 27, 2021last inspection

Since 2015, OSHA inspectors have visited Royal Canin in South Dakota 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Jan 27, 2021 as a planned inspection, in North Sioux City.

In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 serious.

The penalties, $11,000 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.

Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $4,874 penalty. Royal Canin averages $11,000 across 1 cited inspection.

It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.

Royal Canin: OSHA citation items per year, 2015 to 2021
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Royal Canin again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345122493 OPENED JAN 27, 2021Closed

Planned · No inspection · Safety · 285 employees at the site · Closed Jan 29, 2021

630 North Derby Lane, North Sioux City, SD 57049 · Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 341131324 OPENED DEC 9, 2015Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 180 employees at the site · Closed Jun 8, 2016

630 North Derby Lane, North Sioux City, SD 57049 · Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(b) · Lockout/tagout
Serious$4,000$4,000May 10, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Serious$7,000$7,000May 10, 2016Final

Severe injury reports

Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.

Dec 5, 2015, North Sioux City: Hospitalization · fractures · hand(s), unspecified

An employee was cleaning a running conveyor machine. The employee lost balance and put a hand up to catch themselves. The employee's hand and arm were pulled into the machine by a pulley, resulting in multiple hand fractures that required surgery. The pulley was unguarded at the time of the incident.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.147 · Lockout/tagout

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(b)

(B) Each affected employee shall be instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

Other dog and cat food manufacturing employers in South Dakota

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.