OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Sourceone Graphics Inc: OSHA inspections and violations

Spring Lake Park, Minnesota · Commercial Screen Printing · NAICS 323113

2inspections
10citation items
$2,388current penalties
Sep 15, 2016last inspection

Since 2010, OSHA inspectors have visited Sourceone Graphics Inc in Minnesota 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Sep 15, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Minneapolis.

In all, OSHA issued 10 citation items: 9 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

The proposed penalties came to $2,500; today they stand at $2,388, 4% less.

The rule cited most here is 1910.305 (electrical wiring methods), 2 times.

Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $4,500 penalty. Sourceone Graphics Inc averages $262 across 1 cited inspection.

Sourceone Graphics Inc: OSHA citation items per year, 2010 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Sourceone Graphics Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341778181 OPENED SEP 15, 2016Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 17 employees at the site · Closed Oct 10, 2016

7703 Central Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55432 · Commercial Screen Printing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
Serious$375$262Sep 23, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1) · Eye and face protection
Serious$0$0Sep 23, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1910.138(a) · Gloves and hand protection
Serious$0$0Sep 23, 2016Final

Inspection 314200106 OPENED MAR 2, 2010Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 11 employees at the site · Closed Jul 21, 2010

7703 Central Avenue, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 · Commercial Screen Printing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1 Serious$0$0Mar 9, 2010Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2) · Respiratory protection
Serious$375$375Mar 9, 2010Closed
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.242(b) · Hand and power tools
Serious$375$375Mar 9, 2010Closed
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii) · Electrical wiring methods
Serious$375$375Mar 9, 2010Closed
Citation 1, item 5
29 CFR 1910.305(d)(2) · Electrical wiring methods
Serious$500$500Mar 9, 2010Closed
Citation 1, item 6 Serious$375$375Mar 9, 2010Closed
Citation 2, item 1 Other-than-serious$125$125Mar 9, 2010Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1820.6530

29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)

(d) Hazard assessment and equipment selection. (1) The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall:

29 CFR 1910.133 · Eye and face protection

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1)

(a) General requirements. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2)

(2) The CNP system defaults selected for test pressure shall be set at −15 mm of water (-0.58 inches of water) and the modeled inspiratory flow rate shall be 53.8 liters per minute for performing fit tests.

29 CFR 1910.138 · Gloves and hand protection

29 CFR 1910.242 · Hand and power tools

29 CFR 1910.305 · Electrical wiring methods

29 CFR 5205.116

29 CFR 5206.700

Other commercial screen printing employers in Minnesota

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.