OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Ten-E Packaging Services Inc: OSHA inspections and violations

Newport, Minnesota · Testing Laboratories and Services · NAICS 541380

2inspections
6citation items
$2,100current penalties
Jul 6, 2016last inspection

Since 2016, OSHA inspectors have visited Ten-E Packaging Services Inc in Minnesota 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Jul 6, 2016 on a referral, in Newport.

In all, OSHA issued 6 citation items: 4 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

The penalties, $2,100 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.

The rule cited most here is 1910.1025 (lead in general industry), 3 times.

Among professional services employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $1,821 penalty. Ten-E Packaging Services Inc averages $1,050 across 2 cited inspections.

Ten-E Packaging Services Inc: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Ten-E Packaging Services Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341604296 OPENED JUL 6, 2016Closed

Referral · Partial · Health · 33 employees at the site · Closed Dec 1, 2016

1666 Co Rd 74, Newport, MN 55055 · Testing Laboratories and Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2) · Lead in general industry
 Serious$450$450Sep 30, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1) · Lead in general industry
 Serious$450$450Sep 30, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i) · Lead in general industry
 Serious$450$450Sep 30, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii) · Respiratory protection
 Other-than-serious$150$150Sep 30, 2016Final

Inspection 341558963 OPENED JUN 17, 2016Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 33 employees at the site · Closed Aug 22, 2016

1666 Co Rd 74, Newport, MN 55055 · Testing Laboratories and Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication
 Serious$600$600Jun 30, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication
 Other-than-serious$0$0Jun 30, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1025 · Lead in general industry

29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2)

(2) Initial determination. Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this standard shall determine if any exployee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level.

29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1)

(h) Housekeeping—(1) Surfaces. All surfaces shall be maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead.

29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i)

(l) Employee information and training—(1) Training program. (i) Each employer who has a workplace in which there is a potential exposure to airborne lead at any level shall inform employees of the content of Appendices A and B of this regulation.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

Other testing laboratories and services employers in Minnesota

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.