OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

V Chocolates: OSHA inspections and violations

South Salt Lake, Utah · Sugar and Confectionery Product Manufacturing · NAICS 311320

2inspections
5citation items
$1,239current penalties
Nov 4, 2025last inspection

V Chocolates has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Utah, the first in 2007.

OSHA's last visit started on Nov 4, 2025 as a planned inspection, in Salt Lake City.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 5 citation items: 2 serious and 3 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $3,788 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $1,239, down 67%.

Most often, OSHA cited 1910.178, forklifts and other powered industrial trucks (2 items).

For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $4,874. V Chocolates averages $394 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

V Chocolates: OSHA citation items per year, 2007 to 2025
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites V Chocolates again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 348579996 OPENED NOV 4, 2025Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 15 employees at the site · Closed Dec 24, 2025

850 Main Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 · Confectionery Merchant Wholesalers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.263(k)(13) · Bakery equipment
 Serious$788$394Nov 18, 2025Final
Citation 2, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks
 Other-than-serious$0$0Nov 18, 2025Final
Citation 2, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks
 Other-than-serious$0$0Nov 18, 2025Final

Inspection 310458039 OPENED NOV 2, 2007Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 30 employees at the site · Closed Feb 25, 2008

440 W Lawndale Dr, South Salt Lake, UT 84115 · Sugar and Confectionery Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
 Serious$2,500$500Dec 6, 2007Closed
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 10005 C01
 Other-than-serious$500$345Dec 6, 2007Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.178 · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6)

(6) Certification. The employer shall certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l). The certification shall include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation.

29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7)

(7) Industrial trucks shall be examined before being placed in service, and shall not be placed in service if the examination shows any condition adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle. Such examination shall be made at least daily.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

29 CFR 1910.263 · Bakery equipment

Other sugar and confectionery product manufacturing employers in Utah

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.