OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Williams Tank Lines: OSHA inspections and violations

Stockton, California · Other Technical and Trade Schools · NAICS 611519

5inspections
14citation items
$18,590current penalties
Nov 15, 2017last inspection

OSHA has inspected Williams Tank Lines 5 times in California since 2001.

The latest one began on Nov 15, 2017 after a complaint, in Chico.

Those inspections ended with 14 citation items: 5 serious and 9 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $49,815 and now stand at $18,590, 63% lower after settlements or reviews.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for education employers since 2015 is $0, and Williams Tank Lines averages $670 (1 cited inspection).

Williams Tank Lines also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Williams Tank Lines: OSHA citation items per year, 2001 to 2017
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

California · latest 90 days of OSHA records

1,111employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in California

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Williams Tank Lines and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342773843 OPENED NOV 15, 2017Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 24 employees at the site · Closed May 11, 2018

2266 Park Avenue, Chico, CA 95928 · General Automotive Repair · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1 Other-than-serious$335$335Feb 26, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 3362(G)
Other-than-serious$335$335Feb 26, 2018Final

Inspection 300742244 OPENED DEC 21, 2004Closed

Planned · No inspection · Safety · Closed Feb 17, 2005

2266 Park Ave, Chico, CA 95928 · General Freight Trucking, Local · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 125721951 OPENED OCT 27, 2004Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 50 employees at the site · Closed Nov 8, 2004

2941 Navy Dr, Stockton, CA 95206 · Petroleum and Petroleum Products Merchant Wholesalers (except Bulk Stations and Terminals) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on May 12, 2004: Employee injures foot when ran over by tanker

At approximately 5:48 a.m. on May 12, 2004, Employee #1, a trainee-driver, was w orking with another coworker, a trainer driver, on Lane Number 2 of a gas tanker facility. A truck driver had backed his tanker into the gas tanker facility to load the tanker with gasoline and diesel fuel. The trainer-driver unhooked the f ront hose of the tanker as Employee #1 unconnected the rear hose. When Employee #1 unhooked the rear hose, he stepped out of Lane Number 2 and into Lane Number 3. In Lane Number 3, a filled tanker was pulling out of the station and struck E mployee #1 in his foot. The tanker ran over the back of his right foot, causing serious injuries. He was transported to a medical center, where he received medi cal attention and was hospitalized for postoperative treatment of his injured fo ot.

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 305475808 OPENED APR 19, 2004Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 21 employees at the site · Closed Sep 13, 2010

5350 Cherry Ave, Long Beach, CA 90805 · Other Technical and Trade Schools · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Mar 23, 2004: Employee is injured when run over by truck

At 3:30 a.m. on March 23, 2004, Employee #1, a truck driving trainee working for William Tank Lines, was receiving training sessions at the employer's terminal in Long Beach, CA. The employer was a petroleum tanker truck line and it trained drivers with at least one year of verifiable large rig over-the-road trucking p ractice. Experienced drivers were assigned as trainers to ride along with traine es. The terminal was used as a staging area where trucks were kept, cleaned, and prepared for runs. Trucks being cleaned or serviced for trial runs were parked in one or two lines to the south of the main office. There was no established mi nimum distance requirement between the two lines of trucks. At the time of the i ncident, the first coworker was assisting his trainee, Employee #1, in preparing a Peterbilt tractor with dual tankers (company Number 91) for a trial run. The vehicle was parked on the left side of that morning's two-row arrangement, close to the main office. The second coworker, a trainer operating a Peterbilt tracto r (Model Number 379 and company Number 2027) that was hauling two tankers, drove around the office and parked at the head of the line on the right side to pick up his trainee. As a result, the second coworker's tractor was parked beside Emp loyee #1's rig. When the second coworker had picked up his trainee, he set the t ractor in motion once again. Employee #1 was located in front of his rig and his trainer was closing a side of their tractor's engine cover. The second coworker said that he looked in his left rearview mirror and saw Employee #1 and then lo oked at his right rearview mirror in order to maneuver the vehicle to avoid seve ral parked cars. When we looked at his left rearview mirror again, he saw Employ ee #1 lying on the ground between the front and rear tires of his back tanker (N umber 9928). The second coworker immediately stopped the tractor. The first cowo rker said that he did not see what happened at the moment Employee #1 fell under the wheels, but that he did hear a thump and screamed to warn the second cowork er to stop his vehicle. A manager assessed Employee #1's condition and sent for paramedics. Employee #1 suffered a crushed pelvis and a fractured clavicle. He w as taken to the Long Beach Memorial Hospital for rehabilitation. Employee #1 doe s not recall anything that happened prior to him performing preliminary truck ch ecks.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3272 C
Serious$20,250$8,435May 21, 2004Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 3272 E
Serious$20,250$840May 21, 2004Final

Inspection 300815339 OPENED DEC 13, 2001Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 55 employees at the site · Closed Jul 9, 2002

1477 Tillie Lewis Drive, Stockton, CA 95206 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3203 A
Other-than-serious$410$410Jun 11, 2002Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 3241 A
Other-than-serious$135$135Jun 11, 2002Closed
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 3451 A
Other-than-serious$135$135Jun 11, 2002Closed
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 3661 C
Other-than-serious$135$135Jun 11, 2002Closed
Citation 1, item 5
29 CFR 3664 A07
Other-than-serious$135$135Jun 11, 2002Closed
Citation 1, item 6
29 CFR 3562 A
Other-than-serious$135$135Jun 11, 2002Closed
Citation 1, item 7
29 CFR 5194 F04 A
Other-than-serious$135$135Jun 11, 2002Closed
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 3210 C
Serious$2,475$2,475Jun 11, 2002Closed
Citation 3, item 1
29 CFR 5162 A
Serious$2,475$2,475Jun 11, 2002Closed
Citation 4, item 1
29 CFR 5549 A
Serious$2,475$2,475Jun 11, 2002Closed

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2025, the Stockton site logged 7 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 334 workers: 0.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.9 for its industry. Those cases cost 7 days away from work.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
Williams Tank Lines
Stockton · 2025
334 730.02.9
Stockton - 01
Stockton · 2021
98 303.22.9
Chico - 05
Chico · 2021
17 229.62.9
Chico-05
Chico · 2016
27 000.02.9

Included with any plan: 11 more yearly logs from these sites, back to 2016, with each site's average rate over its latest three years. Already a subscriber? Sign in.

See plans

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 2473.2

Other other technical and trade schools employers in California

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.