OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Xtreme Plus Services LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Leonia, New Jersey · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
3citation items
$9,682current penalties
Jan 14, 2026last inspection

OSHA has inspected Xtreme Plus Services LLC once in New Jersey.

The inspection began on Jan 14, 2026 as a planned inspection, in Leonia; the case is still open.

That inspection ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $14,895 and now stand at $9,682, 35% lower after settlements or reviews.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Xtreme Plus Services LLC averages $9,682 (1 cited inspection).

Xtreme Plus Services LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2026 to 2026
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

New Jersey · latest 90 days of OSHA records

270employers cited

36 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in New Jersey: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in New Jersey

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Xtreme Plus Services LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 348688441 OPENED JAN 14, 2026Open

Planned · Partial · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Open

71 Glenwood Ave, Leonia, NJ 07605 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$4,965$3,227Apr 10, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.502(d) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$4,965$3,227Apr 10, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1) · Material hoists, personnel hoists, and elevators
 Serious$4,965$3,227Apr 10, 2026Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.502(d)

(d) Personal fall arrest systems. Personal fall arrest systems and their use shall comply with the provisions set forth below. Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.

29 CFR 1926.552 · Material hoists, personnel hoists, and elevators

29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1)

(a) General requirements. (1) The employer shall comply with the manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators. Where manufacturer's specifications are not available, the limitations assigned to the equipment shall be based on the determinations of a professional engineer competent in the field.

Other roofing contractors employers in New Jersey

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in New Jersey the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.