OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Z W Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Pampa, Texas · Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing · NAICS 332420

2inspections
6citation items
$14,725current penalties
Jul 13, 2017last inspection

Z W Inc. has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Texas, the first in 2016.

OSHA's last visit started on Jul 13, 2017 after a complaint, in Pampa.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 6 citation items: 4 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $24,542 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $14,725, down 40%.

Most often, OSHA cited 1910.307, hazardous (classified) locations (2 items).

For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Z W Inc. averages $7,363 over 2 cited inspections in that time.

Z W Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2017
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Texas · latest 90 days of OSHA records

391employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Texas: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Texas

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Z W Inc. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342473824 OPENED JUL 13, 2017Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 30 employees at the site · Closed Jan 8, 2018

2930 Hwy 152 West, Pampa, TX 79065 · Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
OSH Act Section 5(a)(1) · General Duty Clause
Serious$9,760$5,856Nov 14, 2017Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1)(i) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
Other-than-serious$782$469Nov 14, 2017Final

Inspection 341413953 OPENED APR 18, 2016Closed

Planned · Complete · Health · 30 employees at the site · Closed Sep 27, 2016

2930 Hwy 152 West, Pampa, TX 79065 · Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1) · General requirements
Serious$4,200$2,520Jul 18, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Serious$4,200$2,520Jul 18, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.307(c)(3) · Hazardous (classified) locations
Serious$4,900$2,940Jul 18, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.307(b) · Hazardous (classified) locations
Other-than-serious$700$420Jul 18, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements

29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1)(i)

(i) When PPE is necessary;

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

29 CFR 1910.22 · General requirements

29 CFR 1910.307 · Hazardous (classified) locations

29 CFR 1910.307(b)

(b) Documentation. All areas designated as hazardous (classified) locations under the Class and Zone system and areas designated under the Class and Division system established after August 13, 2007 shall be properly documented. This documentation shall be available to those authorized to design, install, inspect, maintain, or operate electric equipment at the location.

OSH Act Section 5 · General Duty Clause

Other metal tank (heavy gauge) manufacturing employers in Texas

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Texas the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.