Huntsville, Alabama · Iron and Steel Forging · NAICS 332111
Since 2012, OSHA inspectors have visited Adept Technologies in Alabama 2 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Feb 2, 2024 after a complaint, in Huntsville.
In all, OSHA issued 4 citation items: 3 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $11,900; today they stand at $8,050, 32% less.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Adept Technologies averages $0 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites Adept Technologies again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company201 Electronics Blvd Sw, Huntsville, AL 35824 · Machine Shops · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 23, 2024 | Final |
2865 Wall Triana Hwy, Huntsville, AL 35824 · Iron and Steel Forging · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 OSH Act Section 5(a)(1) · General Duty Clause |
Serious | $4,900 | $3,500 | Jan 28, 2013 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $2,800 | $1,800 | Jan 28, 2013 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.242(b) · Hand and power tools |
Serious | $4,200 | $2,750 | Jan 28, 2013 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii)
(ii) Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer shall ensure that each operator has successfully completed the training required by this paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5).
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
29 CFR 1910.242(b)
(b) Compressed air used for cleaning. Compressed air shall not be used for cleaning purposes except where reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and then only with effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.