OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Automated Testing Solutions Inc: OSHA inspections and violations

Lino Lakes, Minnesota · Industrial Machinery Manufacturing · NAICS 333298

1inspections
8citation items
$2,250current penalties
Mar 2, 2016last inspection

Automated Testing Solutions Inc has one OSHA inspection on record in Minnesota.

OSHA opened it on Mar 2, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Lino Lakes.

From that inspection OSHA issued 8 citation items: 5 serious and 3 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $2,250 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.

Most often, OSHA cited 5206.700, (2 items).

For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Automated Testing Solutions Inc averages $2,250 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Automated Testing Solutions Inc: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records

380employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Minnesota

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Automated Testing Solutions Inc and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341294189 OPENED MAR 2, 2016Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Closed Apr 11, 2016

3520 88th Ave Ne, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 · Industrial Machinery Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 182.653(08)
 Serious$250$250Mar 16, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2) · Respiratory protection
 Serious$375$375Mar 16, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.151(c) · First aid and eyewash
 Serious$625$625Mar 16, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1910.242(b) · Hand and power tools
 Serious$375$375Mar 16, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 5 Serious$375$375Mar 16, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.178(l) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks
 Other-than-serious$125$125Mar 16, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv) · Hazard communication
 Other-than-serious$125$125Mar 16, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 3 Other-than-serious$0$0Mar 16, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv)

(iv) The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information.

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2)

(2) The CNP system defaults selected for test pressure shall be set at −15 mm of water (-0.58 inches of water) and the modeled inspiratory flow rate shall be 53.8 liters per minute for performing fit tests.

29 CFR 1910.151 · First aid and eyewash

29 CFR 1910.151(c)

(c) Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.

29 CFR 1910.178 · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks

29 CFR 1910.242 · Hand and power tools

29 CFR 5206.700

Other industrial machinery manufacturing employers in Minnesota

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.