Inspection 343493706 OPENED SEP 27, 2018Closed
1001 Gallup Drive, Omaha, NE 68102 · Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
OSHA has inspected Gallup, Inc 2 times in Nebraska since 2018.
The latest one began on Sep 27, 2018 to follow up on an earlier case, in Omaha.
Those inspections ended with 4 citation items: 4 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $25,869 and now stand at $22,000, 15% lower after settlements or reviews.
Hazard communication comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1910.1200.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for professional services employers since 2015 is $1,821, and Gallup, Inc averages $22,000 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Gallup, Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1001 Gallup Drive, Omaha, NE 68102 · Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
1001 Gallup Drive, Omaha, NE 68102 · Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Feb 7, 2018: Employee is struck by jogging block in the face and fracture
At 10:00 a.m. on February 7, 2018, an employee was using the companys secondary paper cutter machine to cut a stack of paper to size. The employee had used a high density polyethylene plastic hand-held jogging block to make sure the stack of paper was pushed firmly against back and side guides to ensure the stack was even and in place. The employee engaged the blade and, when it struck the jogging block, it threw the block from the press and struck him in the face, lacerating the skin and fracturing his facial bones below the left eye. The employee did not seek immediate medical attention and had an unrelated medical appointment that same day where he was diagnosed with bruised sinuses. The employee went to the Emergency Room on February 11th because of headaches and was diagnosed with the facial fracture; however, he was not admitted to the hospital at this time. The employee did not show up for work on February 12th and the employer discovered that the employee had died. It was later determined through autopsy results that the employees death was non-occupationally related. Hospitalization was not required at the time of injury. time of injury.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 OSH Act Section 5(a)(1) · General Duty Clause |
Serious | $9,239 | $7,334 | Jun 7, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks |
Serious | $9,239 | $7,333 | Jun 7, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 4a 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $7,391 | $7,333 | Jun 7, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 4b 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 7, 2018 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)
(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1)
(h) Employee information and training. (1) Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i)
(l) Operator training. (1) Safe operation. (i) The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.