OSHA has inspected Kerry, Inc. 12 times in Wisconsin since 2002.
The latest one began on Apr 29, 2026 after a complaint, in Rothschild.
Those inspections ended with 25 citation items: 20 serious and 5 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $84,712 and now stand at $74,975, 11% lower after settlements or reviews.
Lockout/tagout comes up most often in these citations: 9 items under 1910.147.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,872, and Kerry, Inc. averages $11,198 (5 cited inspections).
Kerry, Inc. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
It reported 2 severe injuries to OSHA since 2015.
Citation items per year, by inspection date.
Want to know if OSHA cites Kerry, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Incident on May 22, 2021: Employee crushes finger in belt and pulley, later amputated
At 2:29 p.m. on May 22, 2021, an employee working as a team lead for a spice and extract manufacturer accessed the roof area of the facility to bring a B52 belt to a coworker. The employee noted that the saw dust dryer was turned off after it became clogged within either the piping and/or the conveyor system. The piping from the saw dust dryer was being suctioned up to the roof of the facility feeding the Riverside 1040 screw conveyor which ran the length of the building approximately 60 feet. The screw conveyor was equipped with slide gates that directed the saw dust into the storage bins while operating. The screw conveyor was powered by an electric motor connected to an electrical disconnect next to the conveyor. There were no start or stop buttons for the conveyor line on the roof and flipping the disconnect switch controlled the motion of the conveyor. The employee was in the process of unclogging the saw dust and replacing the motor belt. There was miscommunication regarding the proper belt size for the motor drive. The team had removed the expanded metal guard from the belt and pulley. At about the same time, the coworker removed the lockout device from electrical disconnect. The employee was able to look through an inspection port on the top of the conveyor housing to observe if the screw conveyor was turning. As the employee turned the disconnect switch on, the employee touched the belt on the in-running nip point side to check the belt tension. The employee's left hand was pulled into the nip point crushing his index finger. The employee was hospitalized and 1/3rd of his finger required surgical amputation.
Incident on Nov 13, 2019: Employee burns arm, back, and buttocks on steam released fro
At 10:15 a.m. on November 13, 2019, an employee was trying to clean a pipe. After a coupling was removed, water and steam escaped from the pipe and the employee sustained second degree steam burns to their right arm, back and buttocks. The employee was hospitalized.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.132(a) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
Serious
$8,193
$8,193
Feb 12, 2020
Final
4 older inspections
Inspection 342001633 OPENED DEC 28, 2016Closed
Complaint · Partial · Safety · 25,000 employees at the site · Closed Jun 9, 2017
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Sturtevant site logged 1 recordable injury or illness among about 193 workers: 0.5 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 3.6 for its industry.
Site and year
Workers
Cases
Days-away cases
Rate
Industry median
Kerry - Sturtevant
Sturtevant · 2025
193
1
0
0.5
3.6
Kerry - Rothschild
Rothschild · 2025
112
0
0
0.0
4.2
Kerry Inc
Vesper · 2025
99
0
0
0.0
4.2
Kerry Red Arrow
Manitowoc · 2025
105
4
1
5.2
3.0
Manitowoc (1226 South Water Street) P882
Manitowoc · 2025
80
3
1
8.6
3.0
Manitowoc (4502 Expo Dr) P965
Manitowoc · 2025
24
1
1
4.4
3.0
Kerry Red Arrow Expo
Manitowoc · 2024
34
0
0
0.0
3.0
Kerry Red Arrow Distribution Center
Manitowoc · 2024
24
0
0
0.0
2.6
Severe injury reports
Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 2 reports on file.
Dec 15, 2022, Rothschild: Hospitalization · fractures · thigh(s)
An employee slipped on ice in a parking lot, fell, and suffered a fractured right femur.
Two employees were working to clear a jammed screw conveyor and replace a drive belt. The injured employee's left index finger was crushed in a nip point between the belt and pulley. Approximately one-third of the employee's finger was medically amputated.
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)
(h) Post-mortem data: Increased incidence and/or severity of post-mortem findings may be indicative of maternal toxicity. This can include gross or microscopic pathological findings or organ weight data, including absolute organ weight, organ-to-body weight ratio, or organ-to-brain weight ratio. When supported by findings of adverse histopathological effects in the affected organ(s), the observation of a significant change in the average weight of suspected target organ(s) of treated dams (mothers), compared to those in the control group, may be considered evidence of maternal toxicity.
29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
29 CFR 1910.132(a)
(a) Application. Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.