OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Legend, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Reno, Nevada · Industrial Supplies Merchant Wholesalers · NAICS 423840

10inspections
29citation items
$5,075current penalties
Jul 31, 2020last inspection

OSHA has inspected Legend, Inc. 10 times in Nevada since 1982.

The latest one began on Jul 31, 2020 after a fatality or catastrophe, in Sparks.

Those inspections ended with 29 citation items: 17 serious and 12 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $6,165 and now stand at $5,075, 18% lower after settlements or reviews.

Lead in general industry comes up most often in these citations: 20 items under 1910.1025.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for wholesale employers since 2015 is $3,425, and Legend, Inc. averages $2,950 (1 cited inspection).

1 inspection on this page followed a fatal incident.

Legend, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 1982 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Legend, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344862966 OPENED JUL 31, 2020Closed

Fatality or catastrophe · Partial · Safety · 13 employees at the site · Closed Dec 7, 2020

988 Packer Way, Sparks, NV 89431 · Construction and Mining (except Oil Well) Machinery and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Jul 31, 2020 (fatal): One contractor is killed, another is injured by falling loa

At 12:41 p.m. on July 31, 2020, two men were working as independent electrical contractors. One was 76, and the other was 91. They were in a warehouse of a distributor of mining products. An employee of the mining products distributor was helping them. He operated a powered industrial truck for the firm. The three men were installing a transformer into an 815 assay furnace. Because the contractors had difficulty bending over, the furnace was raised for them. It was elevated on the forks of a Clark C25 gas-powered industrial truck. This was a model number C25L truck, with serial number P2321-0053-9897MP. It had a capacity of 1,900 kilograms (4,200 lbs). The furnace, top and bottom combined, weighed 1,020 kg (2,250 lbs). It was sitting on a pallet on the elevated forks of the truck. The pallet weighed about 11 kg (25 lbs). The forks were approximately 0.9 meters (3 feet) above the concrete floor. The top of the furnace was approximately 0.6 meters (23 inches) above the surface of the pallet. The truck's operator was dismounted from the truck and within 7.6 meters (25 feet) of it. He was the "muscle," holding the transformer in place, while the contractors drilled holes and inserted mounting screws. The distributor's employee was standing on the right side of the PIT with one of the contractors, while the other contractor was toward the front left corner of the load. The load-engaging means had not been fully lowered. The load failed and fell from the forks onto the two contractors. The contractor on the front left corner, the 76-year old, was crushed and killed. The other contractor, the 91-year old, suffered multiple injuries. He was hospitalized. The firm's employee, although working with the contractors alongside the load and thus exposed to the hazard, escaped uninjured. The fatality was not OSHA-covered. This was a multiple-employer worksite. The inspection number for the electrical contractor was 1495692. The inspection number for the distributor was 1486296. distributor was 1486296.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(iii) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks
Serious$2,950$2,950Nov 20, 2020Final

Inspection 317224756 OPENED AUG 26, 2013Closed

Planned · Partial · Health · 16 employees at the site · Closed Oct 15, 2013

988 Packer Way, Sparks, NV 89431 · Industrial Supplies Merchant Wholesalers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication
Other-than-serious$340$250Sep 6, 2013Closed

Inspection 312232838 OPENED MAY 20, 2008Closed

Planned · Complete · Health · 13 employees at the site · Closed Sep 23, 2008

988 Packer Way, Sparks, NV 89431 · Industrial Supplies Merchant Wholesalers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(6)(iii) · Lead in general industry
Serious$1,000$600Jul 9, 2008Closed
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(iia) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Jul 9, 2008Closed
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(2)(i) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Jul 9, 2008Closed
Citation 1, item 1d
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(2)(vii) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Jul 9, 2008Closed
Citation 1, item 1e
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(ii) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Jul 9, 2008Closed
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii) · Electrical wiring methods
Other-than-serious$0$0Jun 20, 2008Closed

Inspection 310067319 OPENED JUN 20, 2006Closed

Planned · Partial · Health · 8 employees at the site · Closed Aug 11, 2006

988 Packer Way, Sparks, NV 89431 · Industrial Supplies Merchant Wholesalers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(7) · Lead in general industry
Serious$375$375Jul 20, 2006Closed
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Jul 20, 2006Closed
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(4)(i) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Jul 20, 2006Closed
Citation 1, item 1d
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Jul 20, 2006Closed
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Jul 5, 2006Closed
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1910.151(c) · First aid and eyewash
Other-than-serious$0$0Jul 5, 2006Closed
Citation 2, item 3
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication
Other-than-serious$0$0Jul 5, 2006Closed

Inspection 307881094 OPENED MAY 26, 2004Closed

Referral · Partial · Health · 8 employees at the site · Closed Aug 13, 2004

125 Manuel Street, Reno, NV 89502 · Industrial Machinery and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(6)(ii) · Lead in general industry
Other-than-serious$0$0Jun 15, 2004Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.134(m)(2)(ic) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Jun 15, 2004Closed

Inspection 305079758 OPENED APR 10, 2002Closed

Referral · Partial · Health · 8 employees at the site · Closed Jun 19, 2002

125 Manuel Street, Reno, NV 89502 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 11, 2002Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2) · Lead in general industry
Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 11, 2002Closed
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1) · Lead in general industry
Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 11, 2002Closed
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1) · Lead in general industry
Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 11, 2002Closed

Inspection 301703047 OPENED AUG 7, 1997Closed

Referral · Partial · Health · 20 employees at the site · Closed Aug 7, 1997

125 Manuel Street, Reno, NV 89502 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 301697322 OPENED JAN 29, 1997Closed

Follow-up · Partial · Health · 20 employees at the site · Closed Jan 29, 1997

125 Manuel Street, Reno, NV 89502 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

2 older inspections

Inspection 301695722 OPENED OCT 16, 1996Closed

Planned · Complete · Health · 20 employees at the site · Closed Jan 29, 1997

125 Manuel Street, Reno, NV 89502 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(6)(ii) · Lead in general industry
Serious$1,500$900Nov 25, 1996Closed
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(5)(i) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Nov 25, 1996Closed
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(3)(ii) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Nov 25, 1996Closed
Citation 1, item 1d
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(4)(i) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Nov 25, 1996Closed
Citation 1, item 1e
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(2)(v) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Nov 25, 1996Closed
Citation 1, item 1f
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Nov 25, 1996Closed
Citation 1, item 1g
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(iv) · Lead in general industry
Serious$0$0Nov 25, 1996Closed

Inspection 114598816 OPENED MAY 19, 1982Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 12 employees at the site · Closed May 18, 1992

125 Manuel Street, Reno, NV 89502 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1) · Electrical wiring methods
Other-than-serious$0$0May 18, 1992Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1025 · Lead in general industry

29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2)

(2) Initial determination. Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this standard shall determine if any exployee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level.

29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(6)(ii)

(ii) If the initial determination or subsequent monitoring reveals employee exposure to be at or above the action level but below the permissible exposure limit the employer shall repeat monitoring in accordance with this paragraph at least every 6 months. The employer shall continue monitoring at the required frequency until at least two consecutive measurements, taken at least 7 days apart, are below the action level at which time the employer may discontinue monitoring for that employee except as otherwise provided in paragraph (d)(7) of this section.

29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(6)(iii)

(iii) If the initial monitoring reveals that employee exposure is above the permissible exposure limit the employer shall repeat monitoring quarterly. The employer shall continue monitoring at the required frequency until at least two consecutive measurements, taken at least 7 days apart, are below the PEL but at or above the action level at which time the employer shall repeat monitoring for that employee at the frequency specified in paragraph (d)(6)(ii), except as otherwise provided in paragraph (d)(7) of this section.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.151 · First aid and eyewash

29 CFR 1910.178 · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks

29 CFR 1910.305 · Electrical wiring methods

Other industrial supplies merchant wholesalers employers in Nevada

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.