Maximum Graphics Inc has 3 OSHA inspections on record in Minnesota, the first in 2008.
OSHA's last visit started on Mar 2, 2017 as a planned inspection, in Chaska.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 6 citation items: 3 serious and 3 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $3,000 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $2,100, down 30%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1910.303, electrical equipment, general requirements (2 items).
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $4,500. Maximum Graphics Inc averages $140 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
Want to know if OSHA cites Maximum Graphics Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company102 Jonathan Blvd N, Chaska, MN 55318 · Printing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2) · Electrical equipment, general requirements |
Other-than-serious | $100 | $70 | Mar 31, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii) · Electrical equipment, general requirements |
Other-than-serious | $100 | $70 | Mar 31, 2017 | Final |
1245 Lakeview Dr, Chaska, MN 55318 · Printing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $1,400 | $980 | Oct 6, 2011 | Closed |
1245 Lakeview Drive, Chaska, MN 55318 · Printing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.178(e)(2) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks |
Serious | $600 | $420 | Feb 28, 2008 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.213(b)(3) · Woodworking machinery |
Serious | $600 | $420 | Feb 28, 2008 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 | Other-than-serious | $200 | $140 | Feb 28, 2008 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.178(e)(2)
(2) If the type of load presents a hazard, the user shall equip fork trucks with a vertical load backrest extension manufactured in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
29 CFR 1910.213(b)(3)
(3) On applications where injury to the operator might result if motors were to restart after power failures, provision shall be made to prevent machines from automatically restarting upon restoration of power.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.