Since 1985, OSHA inspectors have visited Minncast Inc in Minnesota 13 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Jul 23, 2020 as a planned inspection, in Minneapolis.
In all, OSHA issued 32 citation items: 14 serious and 18 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $5,785; today they stand at $4,555, 21% less.
The rule cited most here is 5206.700 (), 4 times.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Minncast Inc averages $970 across 3 cited inspections.
Minncast Inc also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Citation items per year, by inspection date.
Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records
380employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Fridley site logged 7 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 55 workers: 11.1 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 5.4 for its industry. Those cases cost 68 days away from work.
Site and year
Workers
Cases
Days-away cases
Rate
Industry median
Minncast Inc
Fridley · 2025
55
7
5
11.1
5.4
Minncast, Inc.
Fridley · 2023
60
11
9
17.0
5.4
Included with any plan: 5 more yearly logs from these sites, back to 2017, with each site's average rate over its latest three years. Already a subscriber? Sign in.
(e) To achieve compliance with paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, administrative or engineering controls must first be determined and implemented whenever feasible. When such controls are not feasible to achieve full compliance, protective equipment or any other protective measures shall be used to keep the exposure of employees to air contaminants within the limits prescribed in this section. Any equipment and/or technical measures used for this purpose must be approved for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person. Whenever respirators are used, their use shall comply with 1910.134.
(c) Permissible exposure limit (PEL). The employer shall ensure that no employee is exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 µg/m 3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA.
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(1)
(f) Methods of compliance—(1) Engineering and work practice controls. The employer shall use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible. Wherever such feasible engineering and work practice controls are not sufficient to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL, the employer shall nonetheless use them to reduce employee exposure to the lowest feasible level and shall supplement them with the use of respiratory protection that complies with the requirements of paragraph (g) of this section.
29 CFR 1910.110 · Storage and handling of liquefied petroleum gases
29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.