Martinsville, New Jersey · Landscaping Services · NAICS 561730
Since 2005, OSHA inspectors have visited Tree-Tech Inc in New Jersey 3 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Nov 16, 2015 on a referral, in Maplewood.
In all, OSHA issued 8 citation items: 8 serious.
The proposed penalties came to $23,550; today they stand at $18,762, 20% less.
The rule cited most here is Section 5(a)(1) (the General Duty Clause), 2 times.
Among staffing, cleaning and waste services employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $2,201 penalty. Tree-Tech Inc averages $5,250 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites Tree-Tech Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company64 Pierson Road, Maplewood, NJ 07040 · Landscaping Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 OSH Act Section 5(a)(1) · General Duty Clause |
Serious | $7,000 | $5,250 | Apr 28, 2016 | Final |
21 Henry Street, Summit, NJ 07901 · Landscaping Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.332(b)(2) · Training |
Serious | $4,900 | $4,900 | Mar 3, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1910.333(c)(3)(i)(a)(1) · Working near live electrical parts |
Serious | $4,900 | $4,900 | Mar 3, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1910.333(c)(6) · Working near live electrical parts |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 3, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2c 29 CFR 1910.335(a)(2)(ii) · Safeguards for personnel protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 3, 2014 | Final |
7 Adams Road, Martinsville, NJ 08836 · Landscaping Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 OSH Act Section 5(a)(1) · General Duty Clause |
Serious | $2,500 | $1,375 | Jun 9, 2005 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2) · Construction safety programs |
Serious | $1,750 | $962 | Jun 9, 2005 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.28(a) · Personal protective equipment |
Serious | $2,500 | $1,375 | Jun 9, 2005 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(2)
(2) Additional requirements for unqualified persons. Employees who are covered by paragraph (a) of this section but who are not qualified persons shall also be trained in and familiar with any electrically related safety practices not specifically addressed by §§ 1910.331 through 1910.335 but which are necessary for their safety.
29 CFR 1910.333(c)(3)(i)(a)(1)
(i) Unqualified persons. (A) When an unqualified person is working in an elevated position near overhead lines, the location shall be such that the person and the longest conductive object he or she may contact cannot come closer to any unguarded, energized overhead line than the following distances:
29 CFR 1910.333(c)(6)
(6) Conductive materials and equipment. Conductive materials and equipment that are in contact with any part of an employee's body shall be handled in a manner that will prevent them from contacting exposed energized conductors or circuit parts. If an employee must handle long dimensional conductive objects (such as ducts and pipes) in areas with exposed live parts, the employer shall institute work practices (such as the use of insulation, guarding, and material handling techniques) which will minimize the hazard.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.